Richmond, VA

Whether district court erred enjoining military policy prohibiting accession of asymptomatic HIV-positive individuals with an undetectable viral load.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims alleging mistreatment of children in custody of S.C. Department South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP of Juvenile Justice.

Multi-issue appeal from convictions for conspiracy to provide and provision of material support to a foreign terrorist organization.

Challenge to district court's order related to application for order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d).

Whether Petitioner demonstrated nexus between family based particular social group and persecution; other issues.

Whether insurer is entitled to declaratory judgment related to coverage for sex trafficking lawsuit.

Whether district court erred in denying motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to search warrant for defendants' Google accounts; other issues.

Procedural and substantive reasonableness of significant upward variant sentence imposed on conviction for failure to register as sex offender.

Whether Board applied proper standard of review in finding clear error in immigration judge's factual findings underpinning grant of withholding of removal; other issues.

Whether district court erred in finding statute prohibiting disclosure of addresses and telephone numbers of law enforcement officers violates First Amendment.

Whether Peters's 18 U.S.C. § 2, 1028A(a)(1) conviction remains sound following Dubin v. United States, 599 U.S. 110 (2023).

Whether district court erred in granting judgment as a matter of law for defendants related to underinsured motorist claim.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant employer on claims for breach of contract, violations of state wage laws, related claims.

First Amendment challenge to North Carolina's Ballot Selfie Ban.

Whether appellants lacked standing to challenge Virginia statute regulating nomination of candidates for political office.

Petition for review of agency rulemaking related to long-term planning for energy transmission.

Propriety of treating previously admitted noncitizen who applies to adjust status as an alien seeking admission and thus imposing higher evidentiary burden.

Whether district court erred in admitting expert testimony that defendant possessed firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking for § 924(c) conviction.

Whether agency properly denied discretionary relief based on arrest documents; utilization of summary affirmance.

Whether district court erred in issuing nationwide permanent injunction prohibiting defendants from using disputed mark in the United States.

Whether Lindsey Halligan's appointment as U.S. Attorney was lawful; whether indictments sought and obtained by Halligan are valid.

Propriety of enhancement under Sentencing Guidelines for reckless endangerment during flight; whether alternative variant sentence is based on clearly erroneous factual findings.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant, denying summary judgment for plaintiff, related to fraudulent bank transfers.

Whether, in appeal after remand and resentencing, Government has forfeited right to invoke appeal waiver by not raising the issue during the first appeal.

Challenge to agency's denial of applications for marketing authorization for certain bottled e-liquids, including e-liquids in flavors other than tobacco flavor.

Petition seeking writ of mandamus directing the district court to vacate defendant's partial guilty plea.

Whether South Carolina first-degree assault and battery remains "crime of violence" under Sentencing Guidelines after United States v. Clemons, 901 S.E.2d 280 (S.C. 2024).

Whether the district court erroneously enhanced Appellant's offense level under USSG § 3A1.2(c)(2); other issues.

Whether evidence was sufficient for Hobbs Act robbery conviction when victim's cryptocurrency funds were not taken from victim's person or physical presence; other issues.

Whether defendant's right to impartial jury was contravened; whether DEA criminal investigation is "pending proceeding" for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1505; evidentiary issues.

Whether district court erred in finding first-to-file rule deprived relator of jurisdiction to file amended complaint.

Whether Tax Court erred in dismissing petition for redetermination for lack of jurisdiction.

Whether a retired servicemember may be subject to court martial for post-retirement offenses.

Propriety of agency's determination on remand that a violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-248.1 is a categorical crime involving moral turpitude; related issues.

Whether district court erred in certifying "apparent agency" class under West Virginia Consumer Credit Protection Act; related issues.

Whether district court erred in declining to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction claim challenging ERISA annuity buyout transaction.

Whether district court erred in finding Batson claim procedurally barred, denying discovery on claims under Brady, Giglio, and Napue; related issues.

Whether noncitizen may obtain an adjustment of status based on marriage to an asylee if the couple divorces while the adjustment application is pending.

Whether Petitioner is ineligible for cancellation of removal because his conviction under N.C. Gen. Stat. Ann. 90-113.22(a) relates to a controlled substance.

Whether the Board abused its discretion in denying reopening for failure to establish prima facie eligibility for asylum and related relief.

Whether the Board made improper factual determinations; materiality of participation in persecution; existence of duress exception to persecutor bar.

Challenge to cancellation of appellant's typeset and stylized marks that had been registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Whether BIA impermissibly engaged in factfinding; whether sufficient analysis supported rejection of claimed membership in particular social group.

Whether district court erred in denying 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition alleging ineffective assistance arising out of failure to request Remmer hearing.

Challenge to grant of summary judgment in trademark and breach of contract dispute.

Whether harmless error is proper standard of review for preserved error under Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024); other issues.

Whether appeal waiver is valid where court failed to advise defendant of right to have jury determine occasions element of Armed Career Criminal Act.

Whether Wright has established that plain error under Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), affected his substantial rights.

Whether the Government breached Defendant's plea agreement, thereby requiring resentencing; other issues.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant on retaliation claim under False Claims Act.

Whether the district court's consideration of "breach of trust" during sentencing in a revocation hearing was a retributive and prohibited purpose.

Multi-issue appeal from grant of summary judgment, denial of directed verdict on insurance fraud and related claims.

Whether traffic stop was unnecessarily prolonged; whether individual bottles of pesticide in one box constituted a "single package" under Hazardous Materials Transportation Act.

Whether the ALJ (a) reversibly erred in his consideration of the VA's Compensation and Pension Examination; or (b) impermissibly "cherry-picked" the medical evidence.

Appeal from judgment in favor of defendant, denial of motion for new trial, on Title IX, First Amendment claims of failure to protect against sexual harassment, assault in school and retaliation.

Whether appellant must file new notice of appeal after court grants Rule 4(a)(6) motion; whether prison mailbox rule applies to FTCA claims; other issues.

Whether district court erred in granting motion to suppress based on finding that 911 call did not provide reasonable suspicion for stop and frisk.

Whether inmate raised triable factual issues concerning jail's alleged policy or custom not to perform or make referrals for colostomy reversal surgery.

Whether magistrate judge properly denied plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel under Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3613(b)(1).

Whether prosecution under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA) was constitutional; whether the government adequately established jurisdiction; other issues.

Whether the district court abused its discretion by removing a juror for misconduct after jury deliberations had begun; other issues.

Whether USCIS erred in denying visa application under 8 U.S.C § 1184.

Challenge to DEA action interpreting hemp-derived HHC as a Schedule I controlled substance.

Challenge to validity of dredge and fill permit issued pursuant to § 404 of the Clean Water Act.

Whether failure to sever resulted in unfair prejudice to defendants that could not be cured by jury instruction; sufficiency of evidence; other issues.