← Back to cases
25-1380·CIVIL

Chantilly Auto Body, Inc. v. Truist Bank

Status
  1. Scheduled
  2. Argued (current)
  3. Opinion Issued
Question Presented

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant, denying summary judgment for plaintiff, related to fraudulent bank transfers.

Argument Date
September 16, 2026
Argument Time
9:30 a.m.
Panel
VI
Courtroom
Tan Courtroom (Room 223)
Lower Court Judge
Trenga

Panel

Judge Rushing
Senior Judge Keenan
Judge Rodriguez*

Citation

CaseChantilly Auto Body, Inc. v. Truist Bank, No. 25-1380 (4th Cir. argued Sept. 16, 2026)
PanelKeenan, S.J., Rushing & Rodriguez, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Panel That Day

0 of 4 cases argued September 16, 2026 before this panel have been decided.

Authorship Outlook

No opinions from this panel have been decided yet, so authorship can't be narrowed — the 4 pending opinions could come from any of the panelists.

This is a statistical guess based on prior sittings in this dataset, not a prediction of the ruling.

Predicted Opinion Release

Likely between November 12, 2026 and August 21, 2027, with January 6, 2027 the most likely date.

Argued 42 days ago. Comparable cases at this stage almost always still pending — there's no useful tightening yet.

■ ■ □Calibrated (560 prior subject cases + 4 prior panel cases)

80% predictive interval from a log-logistic accelerated-failure-time model fit on 2,134 prior decided cases plus 111 currently-pending cases as right-censored evidence. Updates as days pass with no opinion. How this is calculated →

Oral Argument Audio