Richmond, VA

Whether attempted armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d), categorically qualifies as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3).

Whether district court erred in dismissing relator's complaint alleging False Claims Act violations, denying leave to amend.

Whether school board committed procedural or substantive violations of IDEA, depriving student of free appropriate public education.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants on breach of contract claim.

Challenge to district court's determination that police search using a cell site simulator to locate appellant was constitutional under Fourth Amendment; other issues.

Whether district court erred in declining to order child's return to France under the Hague Convention and the International Child Abduction Remedies Act.

Whether, in denying Petitioner's motion for a continuance to seek new counsel, the immigration court violated Petitioner's due process rights; other issues.

Whether district court erred in enjoining NCAA from enforcing its Five-Year Rule as to appellees for the 2025-26 season.

Propriety of district court's summary judgment grant to employer on Plaintiff's ADEA claim challenging his termination from fire and rescue service training academy.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant employer on age discrimination and retaliation claims; related issues.

Whether district court erred granting summary judgment for lender on claims alleging violations of West Virginia Consumer Credit Protection Act.

Whether debtor plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment on automatic stay claims, debt collection claims, and affirmative defenses; other issues.

Whether district court erred in denying qualified immunity related to deputy's use of force during arrest.

Whether district court erred finding statute setting forth mandatory vaccination requirements for school attendance unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs.

Whether district court erred in entering judgment in favor of defendant on battery claims related to TSA pat-down.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of amusement park on claims related to injuries sustained by contractor inspecting ride.

Whether procedural default for insufficiency claims should be excused and whether district court should have held evidentiary hearing on ineffective assistance of counsel claims.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims alleging interference with plaintiff's wireless network and business relationships.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants.

Whether extrinsic information was improperly brought to the jurors' attention, thereby denying Petitioner an impartial jury.

Whether court erred in establishing base offense level under § 2K2.1(a)(3) because offense involved semiautomatic firearm capable of accepting large capacity magazine; other issues.

Whether district court erred in dismissing takings, equal protection, due process, and other claims related to Baltimore land development.

Whether district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider alleged violations of Administrative Procedures Act related to I-360 VAWA self-petition.

Whether South Carolina law limiting absentee voting by individuals under 65 years of age violates the Fourteenth or Twenty-Sixth Amendment.

Whether the ALJ's residual functional capacity assessment is adequately explained and supported by substantial evidence; other issues.

Whether district court erred in denying qualified immunity to officer on § 1983 claims related to shooting death of plaintiff's decedent.

Whether district court erred in revoking conditional discharge of "sexually dangerous person" under 18 U.S.C. § 4248(f).

Whether district court abused its discretion in denying Appellant's motion to represent himself at sentencing.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant town on § 1983 claims related to sexual assault by police officer.

Whether Brown v. United States, 602 U.S. 101 (2024), forecloses Appellant's Armed Career Criminal Act challenge; whether Government waived reliance on Brown; other issues.

Challenge to district court's orders declining to modify its prior divestiture orders due to changed circumstances.

Whether Board properly denied waiver of inadmissibility, asylum, protection under CAT, withholding of removal, and motion to reopen; venue; other issues.

Whether district court erred in denying motion to remand to state court.

Whether court erred in allowing deliberation on breach of contract claim that was materially different than claim set forth in counseled complaint; other issues.

Whether North Carolina statute regulating sales and distribution of electronic nicotine delivery systems products is impliedly preempted by 21 USC § 337(a).

Whether bankruptcy court erred in denying bank's motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings related to allegations that the bank violated Bankruptcy Code's automatic stay.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment to employer on discrimination and retaliation claims.

Whether detention and removal of Petitioners at conclusion of Form I-130 interviews violates the Due Process Clause or provisional unlawful presence waiver regulations.

Whether IJ and BIA erred in holding petitioner admitted essential elements of controlled substance offense, rendering him ineligible for cancellation of removal; other issues.

Whether MSPB erred in denying petitioner's claims of whistleblower retaliation.

Whether district court lacked jurisdiction to consider school district's claims under the APA, challenging agency's Title IX status determination.

Whether district court erred in ruling insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify nightclub for underlying action; whether appeal is moot; other issues.

Whether plaintiffs sufficiently pled the unlawful conversion of funds from partnership accounts to survive Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.

Propriety of agency's ruling that Petitioner's misdemeanor conviction under § 18.2-57.2, Va. Code Ann., qualifies as a "particularly serious crime"; other issues.

Whether Merrill Lynch's WealthChoice Contingent Award Plan is an "employee pension benefit plan" under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(2)(A)(ii); related issues.

Whether district court erred in sua sponte reversing its prior ruling related to defendants' res judicata defense; other issues.

Whether false statements were made knowingly and were material; sufficiency of evidence for health care fraud and false statement offenses; other issues.

Whether district court plainly erred in classifying Wable's prior West Virginia conviction as a controlled substance offense under the Sentencing Guidelines; other issues.

Whether the term "minor" under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2G1.3(b)(5) is ambiguous, allowing court to consult the Guidelines' commentary.

Whether the district court erred by applying a two-level firearm enhancement pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B1.1(b)(16) (2024); other issues.

Whether the district court erroneously found that the inevitable discovery doctrine did not apply in granting Appellant's motion to suppress.

Whether Virginia's offense for using a firearm while committing a felony, Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-53.1, is a crime of violence under the Guidelines.

Whether removal operations after final removal order qualify as a "pending proceeding" that "is being had before" an agency; other issues.

Whether Class 1 misdemeanor in Virginia is crime for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i)(II).

Whether denial of motion for new trial based on juror misconduct was abuse of discretion given juror's misleading statements during voir dire.