Richmond, VA

Whether district court erred in dismissing appellants' putative class action challenging conditions at West Virginia correctional facilities for lack of standing.

Whether the district court erred in finding that insurance policy and South Carolina law did not allow stacking of underinsured motorist coverage.

Whether district court erred in granting directed verdicts to Appellees in jury trial of consolidated cases related to business license suspensions.

Whether the district court adequately considered the police officers' failures to activate their body cameras when denying the defendant's motion to suppress evidence.

Propriety of rulings limiting examination of postal inspector and permitting witness to testify in uniform; other issues.

Whether the magistrate judge erred in finding the plain language of the policy covered a claim for negligent entrustment of automobile; other issues.

Whether the district court erred in finding defense counsel did not render ineffective assistance during plea negotiations; other issues.

Whether Western District of Virginia was proper venue for drug distribution charges where the drugs were mailed to that district from Florida; other issues.

Challenge to district court's dismissal of Rehabilitation Act discrimination, retaliation, and failure to accommodate claims.

Whether 10-minute traffic stop concluding with K-9 open-air sniff of motorcycle violated Fourth Amendment.

Whether North Carolina district court conviction precludes § 1983 action for First Amendment retaliatory arrest.

Whether Appellant was denied opportunity to cross-examine Government witnesses about key evidence during Government's case-in-chief; whether Appellant waived this issue.

Whether district court abused its discretion in denying Appellant's motion to withdraw guilty pleas based on Government's partial nondisclosure of search warrant; other issues.

Whether threats made to petitioner's son constituted persecution; whether petitioner established nexus between past or feared future persecution and family-based particular social group.

Whether liability insurer has standing to appeal order confirming joint plan of reorganization; whether appeal is equitably moot.

Whether Board abused its discretion in denying motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel.

In a combined sentencing proceeding, whether district court committed reversible procedural error in not addressing some of Defendant's arguments for lower sentences.

Whether the district court erred in declining to preliminarily enjoin dance company's use of certain marks and Mountain Island Day Community Charter other alleged infringements on school's trademark rights.

Whether the district court erred by permitting expert witness to testify about probabilistic genotyping software program; whether sufficient evidence supported convictions; other issues.

Dispute over just compensation for land taken by federal government from county.

Whether order authorizing collection of defendant's cellphone location data violated the Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2523; other issues.

Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petitioner's failure to exhaust his state court remedies should be excused given the delay in his state habeas proceedings.

In denying § 3582(c)(2) motion pursuant to USSG Amendment 821, Part A, whether the district court adequately considered and addressed mitigating factors.

Whether insurance policy's preceding claim or prior notice exclusions apply to securities claim, precluding coverage.

Whether court abused its discretion by misapplying Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 to deny class certification and by excluding Plaintiff's expert.

Whether the Board of Immigration Appeals abused its discretion in not reconsidering that the proposed particular social groups were not cognizable.

Multi-issue appeal, including challenge to jury instructions, district court's denial of judgment as a matter of law, other issues.

Whether the Recreation Covenant is a real covenant running with the land or whether it is a personal covenant.

Whether the district court imposed a procedurally unreasonable sentence by failing to adequately address Solis-Rodriguez's arguments for a more lenient sentence.

Challenge to grant of summary judgment on defamation and declaratory judgment claims.

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9), prohibiting firearms possession by persons convicted of domestic abuse, violates Second Amendment following Supreme Court's decision in Bruen.

Whether erroneous oral jury instructions created fatal variance in violation of the Fifth Amendment when the written instructions corrected the error; other issues.

Whether conviction for coercion and enticement of a minor constitutes aggravated felony sexual abuse of a minor and crime of child abuse.

Whether Government breached plea agreement by arguing for upward departure or variance based in part on defendant's leadership role in offense.

Whether the district court erred in finding, under North Carolina law, that insurance policy was coverage for nonfleet private passenger motor vehicles.

Whether district court should have dismissed this action pursuant to complete arbitration rule; whether arbitrator exceeded his authority under collective bargaining agreement. 492 Utility Workers Union of America AFL-CIO

Whether denial of motion to dismiss based on arbitral immunity is final, appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Multi-issue challenge to dismissal of claims alleging First Amendment violations, conspiracy, wrongful termination, and breach of contract related to city employee's Facebook posts.

Whether district court lacked jurisdiction to enter declaratory judgment on constitutionality of state court consent order; other issues.

Whether fifteen dollar fine implicates a property interest and requires procedural due process protections; related issues.

Whether district court erred in sua sponte striking class allegations regarding racially disparate impact of credit union policy.

Challenge to district cour's dismissal of equal protection claims related to state DOT's failure to issue final determination on relocation costs reimbursement.

Challenge to district court's dismissal of claims related to agency's failure to respond to FOIA request.

Whether court properly granted motion to strike expert's errata sheet in negligence action; scope of Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(e).

Whether district court correctly granted summary judgment on Plaintiff's Title VII and ADA claims premised on Plaintiff's pregnancy related medical condition; other issues.

Whether 8 C.F.R. § 1240.21(c) and the timing provisions of OPPM 17-04 are binding on immigration courts.

Whether Petitioner demonstrated persecution was perpetrated by private actor that the government was unable or unwilling to control to qualify for asylum; claim exhaustion.

Whether the district court erred in its computation of the speedy trial clock; procedural reasonableness of calculated Sentencing Guidelines range; other issues.

Challenge to district court's grant of summary judgment to plaintiff in case involving discontinuation of long term disability benefits under employee welfare benefit plan.

Whether district court erred in denying motions to suppress evidence; whether evidence was sufficient to show racketeering offenses affected interstate commerce; other issues.

Whether officers who are lawfully present on the defendant's property may conduct a protective sweep not in conjunction with an arrest; other issues.

Whether jurisdiction exists to review hold policy regarding adjustment of status eligibility for EB-2 or EB- 3 visa based on retrogression of cut-off date.

Whether photograph depicting adult genitalia touching child's hand sufficiently supported conviction for production of child pornography; propriety of jury instructions; other issues.