23-1799·IMMIGRATION

Lolakshi Kale v. Kika Scott

Affirmed

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether jurisdiction exists to review hold policy regarding adjustment of status eligibility for EB-2 or EB- 3 visa based on retrogression of cut-off date.

Argument Date

March 21, 2025

Argument Time

8:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Butzner Courtroom (Room 201)

Lower Court Judge

Flanagan

Panel

Judge King

Judge Gregory

Judge Heytens

Citation

CaseLolakshi Kale v. Kika Scott, No. 23-1799 (4th Cir. June 3, 2025)

PanelKing, Gregory & Heytens, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Bradley Banias

per CA4 audio archive

Alexandra McTague

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued March 21, 2025 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

23-1799· This case

Lolakshi Kale v. Kika Scott

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Gregory

23-4185

United States v. Jose Ordonez-Zometa

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge King

24-4076

United States v. Julio Alvarado Dubon

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Heytens

Opinions

Majority
by Gregory
June 3, 2025
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Affirmed

June 3, 2025