Remote argument

Whether district court abused discretion in denying motion to withdraw guilty plea, failing to conduct new arraignment hearing after original judge recused without explanation.

Whether prison's internal investigation fulfilled inmate-plaintiff's administrative exhaustion requirement under PLRA.

In dispute over association agreement between law firms, whether district court erred regarding personal jurisdiction, jury instructions, and discovery sanctions; related issues.

Whether plaintiff's amended complaint naming new defendants relates back to the date of his original complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(1)(C); other issues.

Whether adversity of interest is required by Article III and whether it existed at the time the NLRB filed its application for enforcement, in light of the employer's consent to the NLRB order.

Whether magistrate judge erred in setting aside jury verdict and granting new trial on ground that verdict was irreconcilably inconsistent.

Whether, considering the record as a whole, substantial evidence supports the denial of deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture; related issues.

Whether § 924(c) conviction is valid where predicate crime of violence was based on Pinkerton theory of co-conspirator liability; other issues.

Whether, under Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021), the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1) must be satisfied in a single document.

Challenge to district court's denial of motion to preliminarily enjoin government policy restricting public speech by immigration judges; issues of subject matter jurisdiction, standing.

Multiple issues arising from implementation and administration of services provided to intellectually disabled individual.

Whether notification of dispute over loan modification agreement implicated trustee's fiduciary duty under Virginia law.

Whether trial court erred finding individual defendants liable for defamation in case arising out of termination of employment by Village of Bald Head Island.

Whether U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) applies when the unlawfully possessed firearm is the fruit of the underlying felony offense. 15-minute case.

Whether this Court possesses jurisdiction to review BIA's decision in asylum-only proceedings; whether BIA erred in affirming denial of motion to reopen proceedings.

Whether qualified immunity precludes Eighth Amendment, substantive due process, and procedural due process claims related to solitary confinement conditions.

Review of district court order remanding climate-change action to state court.

Whether insurance company has standing to file declaratory judgment action regarding its duty to defend/indemnify prior to suit being filed against insured; related issues.

Whether the district court erred by denying Villa's motion to dismiss the indictment alleging due process and Speedy Trial Act violations; other issues.

Whether district court erred in dismissing procedural due process claim based on trespass bar letter issued by police officer.

Whether district court erred in granting Defendant qualified immunity and summary judgment on malicious prosecution, excessive force, and retaliatory prosecution claims.

Whether district court erred in vacating Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration award finding employee had been wrongfully terminated without just cause.

Whether disabled inmate must show that library access was denied because of his disability to state a claim under the ADA and RA; related issues.

Whether district court properly concluded N.C. Gen. Stat. § 58-58-120 applied and required premium notice be sent only to last known address of insured.

Whether law of the case doctrine precludes reconsidering interlocutory decision that Medicaid free-choice-of-provider provision creates private right of action; related issues.

Whether district court erred in ordering Rule 11 sanctions against plaintiff and counsel.

Whether this Court possesses jurisdiction to review claims related to inclusion in the Terrorist Screening Database and placement on the No Fly List.

Whether district court erred by determining that appellant was bound by collective bargaining agreement and liable for exit contribution; other issues.

Whether district court erred in granting qualified immunity to medical professionals who provided unwanted medical treatment and tests to a mental health detainee.

Whether policy's Pollution Exclusion excludes coverage for losses caused by fire when acetone and methane vapors erupted into flame; related issues.

Whether district court abused its discretion in finding Plaintiffs' evidence sufficient to support attorneys' billing rates in granting motion for attorneys' fees; other issues.

Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), which proscribes illegally reentering the United States after having been previously removed, contravenes Fifth Amendment equal protection principles.

Challenge to class counsel's attorney's fees; whether district court using lodestar method erred in considering coupon value without considering redemption value; related issues.

Whether district court erred in applying USSG § 2D1.1(b)(12) enhancement for maintaining a premises for the purpose of manufacturing or distributing controlled substances.

Whether Petitioner is precluded from pursuing the 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(H)(i) waiver because his qualifying relative died prior to waiver adjudication in immigration court.

Whether district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims because rate-setting decisions are judicially unreviewable.

Whether district court erred in concluding that tax sale was made subject to and without disturbing United States tax liens.

Whether Muslim inmate had a clearly established right to a Kosher diet with meat that satisfied a Halal diet; related issues.

Direct criminal appeal raising multiple issues related to sufficiency of indictment, denial of motion to suppress, judicial bias, validity of sentencing and forfeiture orders, others.

Cross appeals from district court's rulings on claims of breach of contract and unjust enrichment and court's calculation of damages; other issues.

Whether district court erred in denying motions to withdraw consent filed before case was referred to magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Whether good cause existed to grant extension under FRAP 4(m); whether district court lacked discretion to grant extension absent good cause.

Propriety of civil contempt order and imposition of sanctions relating to violations of permanent injunction issued in dispute over probiotic products.

Whether 21 U.S.C. § 848 conviction is for a covered offense under the First Step Act.

Propriety of Appeals Council's decision to exclude claimant's new evidence from record; other issues.

Whether district court erred in concluding that Monell barred constitutional claims related to discipline imposed for student speech.

Whether Maryland's now-repealed crime of assault with intent to prevent lawful apprehension qualifies as a violent felony for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B).

Whether the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal; other issues.