20-2140·ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

NLRB v. Constellium Rolled Products

Dismissed

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether adversity of interest is required by Article III and whether it existed at the time the NLRB filed its application for enforcement, in light of the employer's consent to the NLRB order.

Argument Date

January 25, 2022

Argument Time

2:00 p.m.

Panel

Judge Harris

Judge Richardson

Judge Quattlebaum

Citation

CaseNLRB v. Constellium Rolled Products, No. 20-2140 (4th Cir. Aug. 5, 2022)

PanelHarris, Richardson & Quattlebaum, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Gilbert Dickey

per CA4 audio archive

Gregoire Sauter

per CA4 audio archive

Dallas Kratzer III

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued January 25, 2022 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

19-7855

Jason Jordan v. T. Large

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Quattlebaum

20-2140· This case

NLRB v. Constellium Rolled Products

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Richardson

20-7539

Patrick McGraw v. Theresa Gore

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Harris

Opinions

Majority
by Richardson
August 5, 2022
Read opinion ↗
Dissent
by Pamela Harris
August 5, 2022
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Dismissed

August 5, 2022