Remote argument

Whether district court erred granting preliminary injunction in favor of immigration detainee challenging constitutionality of immigration court's § 1226(a) bond hearing procedures.

Whether district court erred in finding qualified immunity precluded liability for fatal shooting by law enforcement officer; related issues.

Whether trial court erred in finding appellant failed to state a claim for race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; related issues.

Whether entities are political subdivisions of Netherlands under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act; personal jurisdiction; standing; other issues.

Whether North Carolina's non-criminal "Anti-Sunshine Law" violates First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Whether insurance policy's collapse endorsement provided coverage for loss caused by breezeway that cracked and shifted downward by one foot; other issues.

Whether loss from damage to underground pipe was covered under policy or coverage endorsements; other issues.

Whether district court abused its discretion in granting defendant's motion for compassionate release in light of factual record.

Whether Eleventh Amendment precludes suit against Virginia governor for alleged violations of federal law related to now-lifted COVID-19 restrictions; related issues.

Media challenge to denial of intervention and sealing of district court record.

Whether appellees qualified as an employer required to give notice to employees prior to plant shutdown under WARN Act.

Whether the magistrate judge erred in finding that single vendor policy was least restrictive means under RLUIPA for VDOC to further compelling interests.

Whether district court erred in weighing evidence to grant summary judgment, comparing differing wage rates among comparators in Equal Pay Act claim; related issues.

Whether denial of compassionate release was procedurally unreasonable when district court explained its rationale via memorandum after appellant's time for noticing appeal had expired.

Whether substantial evidence supports the finding that the Petitioner failed to show a nexus to a protected ground; related issues.

Whether district court erred in granting judgment sua sponte in favor of appellees; related issues.

Whether district court erred in granting final approval to class action settlement.

Whether district court improperly granted equitable relief when a contractual remedy was available. Other issues.

Whether district court may replace Johnson-infirm predicate by counting multiple convictions as multiple predicates when sentencing court counted same convictions as single predicate.

Whether district court erroneously denied Defendants qualified immunity against Plaintiff's excessive force claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; other issues.

Whether district court erred by finding federal question jurisdiction and denying motion to remand case removed from state court.

Whether district court adequately explained reasons for imposing longer sentence on remand than original sentence.

Whether plaintiff in 8 U.S.C. § 1447(b) naturalization action qualified as prevailing party under Equal Access to Justice Act.

Whether district court erred by granting qualified immunity to officer on excessive force claim based on use of deadly force; other issues.

Ineffective assistance and other challenges to state capital conviction and sentence.

Whether federal common law rule regarding punitive liquidated-damages provisions applies to claims brought pursuant to § 301 of Labor Management Relations Act.

Whether prescription drug rebate statute is ambiguous such that representations based on an incorrect interpretation cannot qualify as false under the False Claims Act.

Whether district court correctly granted summary judgment to employer on claim of Title VII race discrimination for delaying firefighter's admission into internship required for promotion.

Whether dispute arising from union trust agreement is arbitrable under § 302(c)(5)(B) of the LMRA.

Whether TILA allows lender to compel arbitration related to a home loan dispute under arbitration clause in borrower's deposit account agreement with same lender.

Whether district court erred in interpreting contract provisions regarding collateral security in immigration bond surety agreement; related issues.

Whether district court erred in finding that previous state conviction qualified as controlled substance offense based on Shepard documents.

Whether district court erred in calculating maximum term of supervised release for a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D).

Whether BIA erred in failing to reach jurisdictional question related to IJ's belated issuance of an oral decision; other issues.

Whether the district court erred in finding police did not unconstitutionally prolong the duration of a traffic stop pending the arrival of a drug-sniffing canine unit; other issues.

Whether the tax court has jurisdiction to determine an overpayment or to order a refund or credit of taxes paid in a 26 U.S.C. § 6330 collection due process proceeding.

Whether district court abused its discretion by granting application for judicial assistance to obtain discovery for use in foreign proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782.

Challenge to state capital conviction and sentence based on ineffective assistance of counsel.

Whether district court erred in classifying appellant's state court conviction as a "prior conviction" supporting career offender enhancement rather than relevant conduct; related issues.

Whether use of force against pretrial detainee was objectively unreasonable.

Whether evidence was sufficient to support convictions; other issues.

Whether district court properly determined the number of occurrences relating to water damage and applicable policy limits; other issues.

Whether district court erred by concluding on summary judgment that appellant was not entitled to & Accident Ins long-term disability benefits under ERISA plan; other issues.

Whether district court erred in denying motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to unsigned search warrant; other issues.

Whether district court erred in finding that death resulted from defendant's distribution of fentanyl and imposing an upward departure or variance.

Whether prior convictions under S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-445 are divisible as to drug type and therefore amenable to the modified categorical approach; other issues.

Whether district court erred by dismissing Navy contractor's claims for declaratory relief under the Contract Disputes Act for lack of jurisdiction.

Whether Fish and Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Statement appropriately considered pipeline project's impact on wildlife protected by Endangered Species Act.

Review of Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management decisions authorizing pipeline crossing of Jefferson National Forest.