21-1141·CIVIL

Harry Pennington, III v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.

Affirmed

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether appellees qualified as an employer required to give notice to employees prior to plant shutdown under WARN Act.

Argument Date

October 27, 2021

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Lower Court Judge

Childs

Associated Cases

21-1143

Panel

Judge Wilkinson

Judge Niemeyer

Judge Motz

Citation

CaseHarry Pennington, III v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc., No. 21-1141 (4th Cir. Nov. 30, 2021)

PanelWilkinson, Niemeyer & Motz, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Jack Raisner

per CA4 audio archive

Charles Ercole

per CA4 audio archive

Charles Speth II

per CA4 audio archive

John Tighe

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued October 27, 2021 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

19-7634

Brad Faver v. Harold Clarke

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Niemeyer

20-2245

Tracy Sempowich v. Tactile Systems Technology

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Motz

21-1141· This case

Harry Pennington, III v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Wilkinson

Opinions

Majority
by Wilkinson
November 30, 2021
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Affirmed

November 30, 2021