← Back to cases
25-6151·POSTCONVICTION

Christopher Hampton v. Jonathan Nance

Status
  1. Scheduled
  2. Argued (current)
  3. Opinion Issued
Question Presented

Whether the district court erred in denying 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition alleging ineffective assistance of trial and postconviction relief counsel.

Argument Date
October 14, 2026
Argument Time
9:30 a.m.
Lower Court Judge
Lewis

Panel

Chief Judge Diaz
Judge Richardson
Judge Quattlebaum

Citation

CaseChristopher Hampton v. Jonathan Nance, No. 25-6151 (4th Cir. argued Oct. 14, 2026)
PanelDiaz, C.J., Richardson & Quattlebaum, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Panel That Day

0 of 3 cases argued October 14, 2026 before this panel have been decided.

Authorship Outlook

No opinions from this panel have been decided yet, so authorship can't be narrowed — the 3 pending opinions could come from any of the panelists.

This is a statistical guess based on prior sittings in this dataset, not a prediction of the ruling.

Predicted Opinion Release

Likely between December 3, 2026 and July 27, 2027, with February 2, 2027 the most likely date.

Argued 14 days ago. Comparable cases at this stage almost always still pending — there's no useful tightening yet.

■ ■ □Calibrated (123 prior subject cases + 3 prior panel cases)

80% predictive interval from a log-logistic accelerated-failure-time model fit on 2,134 prior decided cases plus 111 currently-pending cases as right-censored evidence. Updates as days pass with no opinion. How this is calculated →

Oral Argument Audio