24-1399·CIVIL

AAR v. Jehmal Hudson

Affirmed in Part

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Multi-issue appeal of district court's order dismissing plaintiff's claims challenging the constitutionality of Virginia statute giving Internet broadband service providers access rights to railroad property.

Argument Date

January 29, 2025

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Tweed Courtroom (Room 414-D)

Lower Court Judge

Novak

Panel

Judge Wilkinson

Judge Harris

Judge Rushing

Citation

CaseAAR v. Jehmal Hudson, No. 24-1399 (4th Cir. July 18, 2025)

PanelWilkinson, Harris & Rushing, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Raymond Atkins

per CA4 audio archive

Erika Maley

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued January 29, 2025 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

22-6055

United States v. James Ervin, Jr.

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Wilkinson

24-1099

Mohammad Qaiymah v. James McHenry, III

Authored by Judge Harris

Opinions

Majority
by Harris
July 18, 2025
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
Normalized: Affirmed in Part

July 18, 2025