24-1141·EMPLOYMENT

Stephanie Redding v. Kristi Noem

Affirmed

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether Plaintiff plausibly alleged she was a qualified individual for purposes of surviving motion to dismiss Rehabilitation Act claim.

Argument Date

December 9, 2025

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Red Courtroom (Room 412)

Lower Court Judge

Novak

Panel

Judge Wilkinson

Judge King

Judge Gregory

Citation

CaseStephanie Redding v. Kristi Noem, No. 24-1141 (4th Cir. Mar. 3, 2026)

PanelWilkinson, King & Gregory, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Theresa Kraft

per CA4 audio archive

Kirstin O'Connor

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

4 of 4 cases argued December 9, 2025 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

23-6775

Eric Rich v. Daniel Hersl

Opinion Issued

Authored by Per Curiam

23-7147

Raymond Richardson v. Jonathan Frame

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Wilkinson

24-1141· This case

Stephanie Redding v. Kristi Noem

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Wilkinson

25-1213

L.M. v. Jonathan Graham

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Gregory

Opinions

Majority
by Wilkinson
March 3, 2026
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Affirmed

March 3, 2026