24-1008·CIVIL

R.A. v. Rhonda McClenahan

Reversed

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether mandate rule barred filing of second amended complaint and, if not, whether that complaint alleged sufficient facts to pierce public official immunity.

Argument Date

October 31, 2024

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Red Courtroom (Room 412)

Lower Court Judge

Bell

Associated Cases

24-1009

Panel

Judge Wilkinson

Judge King

Judge Thacker

Citation

CaseR.A. v. Rhonda McClenahan, No. 24-1008 (4th Cir. Dec. 3, 2024)

PanelWilkinson, King & Thacker, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Sarah Saint

per CA4 audio archive

Stacey Gahagan

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

4 of 4 cases argued October 31, 2024 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

United States v. Sergio Murillo

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge King

24-1008· This case

R.A. v. Rhonda McClenahan

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Wilkinson

24-4027

United States v. Chad Jennings

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Thacker

Opinions

Majority
by Wilkinson
December 3, 2024
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Reversed

December 3, 2024