23-4423·SENTENCING

United States v. Amanda Tostado

Vacated & Remanded

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether reversible inconsistency exists between oral pronouncement of warrantless search condition of supervised release and written judgment; proper incorporation of standing order; harmless error.

Argument Date

December 11, 2025

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Butzner Courtroom (Room 201)

Lower Court Judge

Flanagan

Panel

Chief Judge Diaz

Judge Rushing

Judge Heytens

Citation

CaseUnited States v. Amanda Tostado, No. 23-4423 (4th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026)

PanelDiaz, C.J., Rushing & Heytens, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Sean Vitrano

per CA4 audio archive

Katherine Englander

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

2 of 3 cases argued December 11, 2025 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

23-4423· This case

United States v. Amanda Tostado

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Heytens

25-4012

United States v. Joseph Castellano

Opinion Issued

Authored by Chief Judge Diaz

Still Pending

25-1430

Kristin Simmons v. UM Capital Region Health, Inc.

Argued

Opinions

Majority
by Heytens
March 31, 2026
Read opinion ↗
Dissent
by Rushing
March 31, 2026
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Vacated and remanded for resentencing
Normalized: Vacated & Remanded

March 31, 2026