23-4190·SENTENCING
United States v. Stanley Lubkin (Lewis) 44-53-375(B) is divisible as to drug type and whether South Carolina's definition of "methamphetamine" is broader than the federal definition.
Dismissed
Status
- Scheduled
- Argued
- Opinion Issued (current)
Question Presented
Whether Lubkin's prior convictions for manufacturing methamphetamine under S.C. Code § 44-53- 375 qualify as serious drug offenses under the Armed Career Criminal Act. No published authority on whether §
Argument Date
November 1, 2024
Argument Time
8:30 a.m.
Panel
IV
Courtroom
Gold Courtroom (Room 348)
Panel
Judge Wilkinson
Judge Quattlebaum
Judge Heytens
Citation
CaseUnited States v. Stanley Lubkin (Lewis) 44-53-375(B) is divisible as to drug type and whether South Carolina's definition of "methamphetamine" is broader than the federal definition., No. 23-4190 (4th Cir. Dec. 4, 2024)
PanelWilkinson, Quattlebaum & Heytens, JJ.
Arguing Counsel
Panel That Day
3 of 3 cases argued November 1, 2024 before this panel have been decided.
Decided
23-2221
Penny Jo Barnett v. United States of America
Authored by Judge Quattlebaum
23-4190· This case
United States v. Stanley Lubkin (Lewis) 44-53-375(B) is divisible as to drug type and whether South Carolina's definition of "methamphetamine" is broader than the federal definition.
Authored by Judge Wilkinson
24-1080
Rohan Dhruva v. CuriosityStream, Inc.
Authored by Judge Heytens
Opinions
- Read opinion ↗December 4, 2024Majorityby Wilkinson
Disposition
Dismissed
December 4, 2024