22-6464·CIVIL COMMITMENT
United States v. Nathaniel Williams
Vacated & Remanded
Status
- Scheduled
- Argued
- Opinion Issued (current)
Question Presented
Whether the district court erred in reading the word "unconditional" into 18 U.S.C § 4246(d)'s substantial risk analysis.
Argument Date
September 14, 2022
Argument Time
9:30 a.m.
Panel
IV
Courtroom
Gold Courtroom (Room 348)
Lower Court Judge
Britt
Panel
Judge Motz
Judge Richardson
Judge Heytens
Citation
CaseUnited States v. Nathaniel Williams, No. 22-6464 (4th Cir. Nov. 17, 2022)
PanelMotz, Richardson & Heytens, JJ.
Arguing Counsel
Panel That Day
4 of 4 cases argued September 14, 2022 before this panel have been decided.
Decided
19-2406
Madison Mechanical, Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
Authored by Judge Heytens
21-1230
Blazine Monaco v. WV Parkways Authority
Authored by Judge Richardson
21-1499
Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Joshua Stein
22-6464· This case
United States v. Nathaniel Williams
Authored by Judge Heytens
Opinions
- Read opinion ↗November 17, 2022Majorityby Heytens
- Read opinion ↗November 17, 2022Dissentby Richardson
Disposition
- Court
- Vacated and remanded
- Normalized
- Vacated & Remanded
November 17, 2022