22-6313·CIVIL RIGHTS

Daniel Phoenix v. Mark Amonette

Vacated & Remanded

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether district court correctly determined that absence of admissible expert testimony necessarily doomed plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim; other issues.

Argument Date

January 25, 2024

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Tweed Courtroom (Room 414-D)

Lower Court Judge

Cullen

Panel

Judge Wilkinson

Judge Gregory

Judge Heytens

Citation

CaseDaniel Phoenix v. Mark Amonette, No. 22-6313 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2024)

PanelWilkinson, Gregory & Heytens, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Libby Baird

per CA4 audio archive

Rosalie Fessier

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued January 25, 2024 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

22-2187

Taylor Quinn v. Christopher Zerkle

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Gregory

22-6313· This case

Daniel Phoenix v. Mark Amonette

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Heytens

23-1821

Mark Zaid v. Department of Justice.

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Wilkinson

Opinions

Majority
by Heytens
March 18, 2024
Read opinion ↗
Partial Concurrence/Dissent
by Wilkinson
March 18, 2024
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Vacated and remanded
Normalized: Vacated & Remanded

March 18, 2024