22-4230·SENTENCING

United States v. Dehaven Craig

Vacated & Remanded

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether the Government breached the plea agreement by arguing for Sentencing Guidelines enhancements predicated on facts outside of the parties' relevant conduct stipulation.

Argument Date

January 28, 2025

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Red Courtroom (Room 412)

Lower Court Judge

Kleeh

Panel

Chief Judge Diaz

Judge Quattlebaum

Judge Rushing

Citation

CaseUnited States v. Dehaven Craig, No. 22-4230 (4th Cir. June 30, 2025)

PanelDiaz, C.J., Quattlebaum & Rushing, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Barry Beck

per CA4 audio archive

Lara Omps-Botteicher

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 4 cases argued January 28, 2025 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

22-4230· This case

United States v. Dehaven Craig

Opinion Issued

Authored by Chief Judge Diaz

24-1432

Sally Tarquinio v. Johns Hopkins University

Opinion Issued

Authored by Chief Judge Diaz

24-1450

Brainchild Surgical Devices, LLC v. CPA Global Limited

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Quattlebaum

Still Pending

24-1447

Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Federal Highway Administration

Argued

Opinions

Majority
by Diaz
June 30, 2025
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Vacated and remanded
Normalized: Vacated & Remanded

June 30, 2025