22-4134·CRIMINAL

United States v. Maurice Bailey

Vacated & Remanded

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether district court order denying motion to suppress when investigator allegedly breached promise not to prosecute defendant in violation of due process was error.

Argument Date

April 13, 2023

Lower Court Judge

Tilley

Panel

Judge Diaz

Chief Judge Gregory

Judge Thacker

Citation

CaseUnited States v. Maurice Bailey, No. 22-4134 (4th Cir. July 17, 2023)

PanelGregory, C.J., Diaz & Thacker, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Thomas Maher

per CA4 audio archive

Craig Principe

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued April 13, 2023 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

22-1820

Diana Mey v. Judson Phillips

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Thacker

22-1971

Jacob Doe v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Diaz

22-4134· This case

United States v. Maurice Bailey

Opinion Issued

Authored by Chief Judge Gregory

Opinions

Majority
by Gregory
July 17, 2023
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Vacated and remanded
Normalized: Vacated & Remanded

July 17, 2023