22-2263·BANKRUPTCY
Sheila Trantham v. Steven Tate
Reversed & Remanded
Status
- Scheduled
- Argued
- Opinion Issued (current)
Question Presented
Standing to appeal; whether bankruptcy court exceeded its authority by adopting local plan form mandating that property of estate vests after final decree.
Argument Date
May 8, 2024
Argument Time
9:30 a.m.
Panel
I
Courtroom
Red Courtroom (Room 412)
Lower Court Judge
Cogburn
Panel
Chief Judge Diaz
Judge Wilkinson
Senior Judge Motz
Citation
CaseSheila Trantham v. Steven Tate, No. 22-2263 (4th Cir. Aug. 13, 2024)
PanelDiaz, C.J., Motz, S.J., Wilkinson, J.
Arguing Counsel
Panel That Day
4 of 4 cases argued May 8, 2024 before this panel have been decided.
Decided
22-1895
Stanley Friedler, M.d.; Gail Friedler; Richard Friedler; Milan Wister, M.d.; Amy Wister; Philip Kontis, M.d.; Cindy Kontis; Gordon Boone v. Stifel, Nicolaus, & Company, Inc; Coleman Joseph Devlin
Authored by Chief Judge Diaz
22-2263· This case
Sheila Trantham v. Steven Tate
Authored by Chief Judge Diaz
23-1242
Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership v. Beaufort County; Eric Greenway, Beaufort County Administrator; Hillary Austin, Zoning and Development Administrator for Beaufort County
Authored by Judge Wilkinson
23-1661
Jake's Fireworks Inc. v. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
Authored by Senior Judge Motz
Opinions
- Read opinion ↗August 13, 2024Majorityby Diaz
- Read opinion ↗August 13, 2024Concurrenceby Wilkinson
Disposition
- Court
- Reversed and remanded
- Normalized
- Reversed & Remanded
August 13, 2024