22-1221·IMMIGRATION

Jose Martinez v. Merrick Garland

Dismissed

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Propriety of agency's legal analysis relative to Petitioner's claim for withholding of removal and whether substantial evidence supports adverse factual conclusion; other issues.

Argument Date

May 3, 2023

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Gold Courtroom (Room 348)

Panel

Judge Diaz

Judge Rushing

Senior Judge Floyd

Citation

CaseJose Martinez v. Merrick Garland, No. 22-1221 (4th Cir. Nov. 16, 2023)

PanelFloyd, S.J., Diaz & Rushing, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Michael Ward

per CA4 audio archive

Robert Tennyson Jr.

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued May 3, 2023 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

21-6829

United States v. Danny Smith (Hudson) S.Ct. 2389.

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Diaz

22-1221· This case

Jose Martinez v. Merrick Garland

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Rushing

22-2078

FTC v. Kristy Ross

Opinion Issued

Authored by Senior Judge Floyd

Opinions

Majority
by Rushing
November 16, 2023
Read opinion ↗
Concurring in Judgment
by Floyd
November 16, 2023
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Dismissed

November 16, 2023