21-7362·CIVIL

Matthew Griffin v. Nadine Bryant

Vacated & Remanded

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether administrative remedies are "available" for purposes of PLRA when prison policy limits number of grievances that will be processed at a time.

Argument Date

October 28, 2022

Argument Time

8:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Tan Courtroom (Room 223)

Lower Court Judge

Myers

Panel

Judge King

Judge Harris

Judge Nachmanoff*

Citation

CaseMatthew Griffin v. Nadine Bryant, No. 21-7362 (4th Cir. Dec. 27, 2022)

PanelKing, Harris & Nachmanoff, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Benjamin Gunning

per CA4 audio archive

Stephanie Brennan

per CA4 audio archive

Jennifer Maldonado

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued October 28, 2022 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

21-1826

R.S. v. Board of Directors of Woods Charter School Company

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Nachmanoff*

21-4449

United States v. Starsha Limbaugh

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Harris

21-7362· This case

Matthew Griffin v. Nadine Bryant

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge King

Opinions

Majority
by King
December 27, 2022
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Vacated and remanded
Normalized: Vacated & Remanded

December 27, 2022