21-7283·POSTCONVICTION

United States v. Willie Slocum, Jr.

Vacated & Remanded

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Propriety of the district court's rejection of Slocum's claim that counsel was ineffective in failing to challenge Count 2 of the indictment as multiplicitous.

Argument Date

March 21, 2024

Panel

Courtroom

Butzner Courtroom (Room 201)

Lower Court Judge

Copenhaver

Panel

Chief Judge Diaz

Judge Quattlebaum

Judge Rushing

Citation

CaseUnited States v. Willie Slocum, Jr., No. 21-7283 (4th Cir. July 1, 2024)

PanelDiaz, C.J., Quattlebaum & Rushing, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Salvatore Mancina

per CA4 audio archive

Joshua Hanks

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

2 of 2 cases argued March 21, 2024 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

21-7283· This case

United States v. Willie Slocum, Jr.

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Quattlebaum

23-1537

Csx Transportation, Inc v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company; Norfolk & Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company

Opinion Issued

Authored by Chief Judge Diaz

Opinions

Majority
by Quattlebaum
July 1, 2024
Read opinion ↗
Concurrence
by Diaz
July 1, 2024
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Vacated and remanded
Normalized: Vacated & Remanded

July 1, 2024