21-6658·POSTCONVICTION
United States v. Carlos McClammy
Affirmed
Status
- Scheduled
- Argued
- Opinion Issued (current)
Question Presented
Whether the district court erred by holding that challenged 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) conviction was based on predicate offense of bank robbery, rather than Hobbs Act conspiracy.
Argument Date
December 7, 2022
Argument Time
9:30 a.m.
Panel
III
Courtroom
Blue Courtroom (Room 339)
Lower Court Judge
Hudson
Panel
Judge Wilkinson
Judge Rushing
Senior Judge Floyd
Citation
CaseUnited States v. Carlos McClammy, No. 21-6658 (4th Cir. July 24, 2023)
PanelFloyd, S.J., Wilkinson & Rushing, JJ.
Arguing Counsel
Panel That Day
4 of 4 cases argued December 7, 2022 before this panel have been decided.
Decided
20-2117
Osman Jalloh v. Merrick Garland
Authored by Judge Wilkinson
21-2418
Julio Sosa Uvalle v. Merrick Garland
Authored by Senior Judge Floyd
21-6658· This case
United States v. Carlos McClammy
Authored by Judge Rushing
22-1110
United States v. Southern Coal Corporation
Authored by Senior Judge Floyd
Opinions
- Read opinion ↗July 24, 2023Majorityby Rushing
Disposition
Affirmed
July 24, 2023