21-6507·CIVIL RIGHTS

David Richardson v. Harold Clarke

Affirmed in Part

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether summary judgment for Defendants was proper on RLUIPA claim alleging substantial burden and on failure to accommodate disability claim; other issues.

Argument Date

September 13, 2022

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Tweed Courtroom (Room 414-D)

Lower Court Judge

Hudson

Panel

Judge Diaz

Judge Thacker

Judge Quattlebaum

Citation

CaseDavid Richardson v. Harold Clarke, No. 21-6507 (4th Cir. Nov. 7, 2022)

PanelDiaz, Thacker & Quattlebaum, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Oren Nimni

per CA4 audio archive

Kevin Gallagher

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

2 of 2 cases argued September 13, 2022 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

18-2496

Sothon Song v. Merrick Garland

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Diaz

21-6507· This case

David Richardson v. Harold Clarke

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Quattlebaum

Opinions

Majority
by Quattlebaum
November 7, 2022
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded
Normalized: Affirmed in Part

November 7, 2022