21-1575·CIVIL RIGHTS

Rashad Riddick v. Jack Barber

Reversed & Remanded

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether involuntarily-committed Appellant alleged facts sufficient to overcome presumption of validity accorded professional judgments regarding prolonged restraint and seclusion; related issues.

Argument Date

May 10, 2024

Argument Time

8:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Red Courtroom (Room 412)

Lower Court Judge

Novak

Panel

Judge Gregory

Judge Harris

Senior Judge Faber*

Citation

CaseRashad Riddick v. Jack Barber, No. 21-1575 (4th Cir. July 26, 2024)

PanelFaber, S.J., Gregory & Harris, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Joshua Britt

per CA4 audio archive

Jonathan Backer

per CA4 audio archive

Maurice Fisher Jr.

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued May 10, 2024 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

21-1575· This case

Rashad Riddick v. Jack Barber

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Harris

23-1107

Kristee Boyle v. Joseph Azzari, Jr.

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Gregory

23-1582

Jong Lee v. Agape Health Management, Inc.

Opinion Issued

Opinions

Majority
by Harris
July 26, 2024
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Reversed and remanded
Normalized: Reversed & Remanded

July 26, 2024