21-1085·CIVIL

State of South Carolina v. US Army Corps Expansion Plan

Vacated & Remanded

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Challenge to district court order enjoining implementation of Corps' plan to bring the Savannah Harbor into compliance with the ESA.

Argument Date

January 27, 2023

Argument Time

8:30 a.m.

Panel

III

Courtroom

Blue Courtroom (Room 339)

Lower Court Judge

Gergel

Panel

Judge Niemeyer

Judge King

Judge Diaz

Citation

CaseState of South Carolina v. US Army Corps Expansion Plan, No. 21-1085 (4th Cir. Apr. 19, 2023)

PanelNiemeyer, King & Diaz, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Michael Gray

per CA4 audio archive

Chad Johnston

per CA4 audio archive

David Moore

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued January 27, 2023 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

21-1085· This case

State of South Carolina v. US Army Corps Expansion Plan

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Diaz

21-4322

United States v. Bruce Sturtz

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Niemeyer

21-4468

United States v. Jacquez Hill

Opinion Issued

Authored by Per Curiam

Opinions

Majority
by Diaz
April 19, 2023
Read opinion ↗
Dissent
by Niemeyer
April 19, 2023
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Vacated and remanded
Normalized: Vacated & Remanded

April 19, 2023