20-1654·IMMIGRATION
Carlos Escobar Gomez v. Merrick Garland
Remanded
Status
- Scheduled
- Argued
- Opinion Issued (current)
Question Presented
Propriety of the agency's ruling that Petitioner's proposed social groups were not cognizable, as a matter of law, because they lacked particularity.
Argument Date
September 22, 2021
Panel
III
Panel
Judge Wilkinson
Judge Wynn
Judge Floyd
Citation
CaseCarlos Escobar Gomez v. Merrick Garland, No. 20-1654 (4th Cir. Dec. 10, 2021)
PanelWilkinson, Wynn & Floyd, JJ.
Arguing Counsel
Panel That Day
4 of 4 cases argued September 22, 2021 before this panel have been decided.
Decided
Opinions
- Read opinion ↗December 10, 2021Majorityby Floyd
- Read opinion ↗December 10, 2021Concurrenceby Wynn
- Read opinion ↗December 10, 2021Dissentby Wilkinson
Disposition
- Court
- granted and remanded for further proceedings
- Normalized
- Remanded
December 10, 2021