19-6412·POSTCONVICTION

Charles Plymail v. Patrick Mirandy

Reversed

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the delay in adjudicating direct appeal, trial court's coercive remarks to the jury, and prosecutor's closing arguments.

Argument Date

May 5, 2021

Argument Time

2:00 p.m.

Panel

III

Lower Court Judge

Chambers

Panel

Judge Niemeyer

Judge Wynn

Judge Richardson

Citation

CaseCharles Plymail v. Patrick Mirandy, No. 19-6412 (4th Cir. Aug. 10, 2021)

PanelNiemeyer, Wynn & Richardson, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Mackenzie Herman

per CA4 audio archive

Henna Shah

per CA4 audio archive

John Korzen

per CA4 audio archive

Thomas Lampman

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued May 5, 2021 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

19-4019

United States v. Anthony Caldwell

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Wynn

19-6412· This case

Charles Plymail v. Patrick Mirandy

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Richardson

20-1334

Christopher Lightfoot v. Georgia-pacific Wood Products, LLC; Georgia-pacific LLC

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Niemeyer

Opinions

Majority
by Richardson
August 10, 2021
Read opinion ↗
Majority
September 7, 2021
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Reversed

August 10, 2021