19-4707·CRIMINAL

United States v. Kacey Hicks

Affirmed

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether conviction for maintaining drug-involved premises requires proof that illicit drug activity was a primary or significant purpose of the premises; other issues.

Argument Date

September 16, 2022

Argument Time

8:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Butzner Courtroom (Room 201)

Lower Court Judge

Boyle

Panel

Judge King

Judge Rushing

Judge Heytens

Citation

CaseUnited States v. Kacey Hicks, No. 19-4707 (4th Cir. Apr. 5, 2023)

PanelKing, Rushing & Heytens, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Geoffrey Willis

per CA4 audio archive

Daniel Bubar

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

4 of 4 cases argued September 16, 2022 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

19-4707· This case

United States v. Kacey Hicks

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Rushing

21-1764

Brian Bowen, II v. Adidas America Inc.

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Rushing

21-2102

Tammie Thompson v. Ciox Health, LLC

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Heytens

22-1280

Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge King

Opinions

Majority
by Rushing
April 5, 2023
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Affirmed

April 5, 2023