19-4077·SENTENCING

United States v. Richard Haas ( Payne ) other issues.

Affirmed in Part

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether district court erroneously applied U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual §§ 2G2.1(b)(1)(A), 4B1.5(b) for offense involving minor and absent covered-sex-crime-derived Guidelines range;

Argument Date

October 29, 2020

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Judge Wilkinson

Judge Harris

Judge Richardson

Citation

CaseUnited States v. Richard Haas ( Payne ) other issues., No. 19-4077 (4th Cir. Jan. 27, 2021)

PanelWilkinson, Harris & Richardson, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

William Dinkin

per CA4 audio archive

Heather Mansfield

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued October 29, 2020 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

19-1862

Juan Carlos Blanco Ayala v. United States of America

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Wilkinson

19-4077· This case

United States v. Richard Haas ( Payne ) other issues.

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Richardson

19-6871

Devion Gentry v. A. Robinson

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Harris

Opinions

Majority
by Richardson
January 27, 2021
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded
Normalized: Affirmed in Part

January 27, 2021