19-1904·IMMIGRATION

Miguel Arevalo-Quintero v. William Barr

Other

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether IJ has heightened duty in pro se cases to develop the record to determine whether facts presented fit within a cognizable particular social group.

Argument Date

December 8, 2020

Panel

Judge Motz

Judge Wynn

Judge Floyd

Citation

CaseMiguel Arevalo-Quintero v. William Barr, No. 19-1904 (4th Cir. May 26, 2021)

PanelMotz, Wynn & Floyd, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Susan Manning

per CA4 audio archive

Jenny Lee

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

4 of 4 cases argued December 8, 2020 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

18-1811

US, et.al v. Latonya Mallory

Opinion Issued

19-1904· This case

Miguel Arevalo-Quintero v. William Barr

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Wynn

19-2147

United States v. Hunter Dent

Opinion Issued

Authored by Per Curiam

19-4190

United States v. Angel Vasquez Flores

Opinion Issued

Authored by Per Curiam

Opinions

Majority
by Wynn
May 26, 2021
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: granted and remand awarded
Normalized: Other

May 26, 2021