19-1871·EMPLOYMENT
Michael Tinsley v. City of Charlotte
Vacated & Remanded
Status
- Scheduled
- Argued
- Opinion Issued (current)
Question Presented
Whether the district court erroneously denied Defendant's motion for a directed verdict and abused its discretion in awarding equitable relief.
Argument Date
October 28, 2020
Argument Time
9:30 a.m.
Panel
II
Lower Court Judge
Mullen
Panel
Chief Judge Gregory
Judge Wilkinson
Judge Keenan
Citation
CaseMichael Tinsley v. City of Charlotte, No. 19-1871 (4th Cir. May 5, 2021)
PanelGregory, C.J., Wilkinson & Keenan, JJ.
Arguing Counsel
Panel That Day
4 of 4 cases argued October 28, 2020 before this panel have been decided.
Decided
19-1350
Loren Varner v. Michael Roane
Authored by Judge Wilkinson
19-1871· This case
Michael Tinsley v. City of Charlotte
Authored by Judge Keenan
19-1910
John Doe 4 v. Shenandoah Valley Juvenile
Authored by Chief Judge Gregory
19-4277
United States v. Stephen McGrath
Authored by Chief Judge Gregory
Opinions
- Read opinion ↗May 5, 2021Majorityby Keenan
- Read opinion ↗May 5, 2021Dissentby Vacated And Remanded Gregory
Disposition
- Court
- Vacated and remanded
- Normalized
- Vacated & Remanded
May 5, 2021