19-1693·IMMIGRATION

Ingrid Nolasco-Figueroa v. Merrick Garland

Affirmed

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Propriety of denying relief based on failure to proffer family members' corroborating statements when circuit precedent supports the agency discrediting the same; other issues.

Argument Date

May 4, 2021

Argument Time

9:30 a.m.

Panel

Chief Judge Gregory

Judge Motz

Judge Thacker

Citation

CaseIngrid Nolasco-Figueroa v. Merrick Garland, No. 19-1693 (4th Cir. June 15, 2021)

PanelGregory, C.J., Motz & Thacker, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

Rebekah Grafton

per CA4 audio archive

John Holt

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued May 4, 2021 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

19-1693· This case

Ingrid Nolasco-Figueroa v. Merrick Garland

Opinion Issued

Authored by Per Curiam

20-1329

Fredric Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc.

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Motz

20-1408

Michael Zito v. N.C. Coastal Resources Comm. Amendment

Opinion Issued

Authored by Chief Judge Gregory

Opinions

Per Curiam
June 15, 2021
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Denied
Normalized: Affirmed

June 15, 2021