18-4455·CRIMINAL

United States v. Kendrick Brinkley

Reversed & Remanded

Status

Scheduled
Argued
Opinion Issued (current)

Question Presented

Whether officers had reasonable belief under standard articulated in Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980), to enter apartment to serve arrest warrant.

Argument Date

January 31, 2020

Argument Time

8:30 a.m.

Panel

Courtroom

Butzner Courtroom (Room 201)

Lower Court Judge

Conrad

Panel

Chief Judge Gregory

Judge Motz

Judge Richardson

Citation

CaseUnited States v. Kendrick Brinkley, No. 18-4455 (4th Cir. Nov. 13, 2020)

PanelGregory, C.J., Motz & Richardson, JJ.

Arguing Counsel

John Davis

per CA4 audio archive

Amy Ray

per CA4 audio archive

Panel That Day

3 of 3 cases argued January 31, 2020 before this panel have been decided.

Decided

18-4455· This case

United States v. Kendrick Brinkley

Opinion Issued

Authored by Judge Motz

19-1091

Common Cause v. David Lewis

Opinion Issued

19-1383

Felicia Dean v. Stephen McKinney

Opinion Issued

Authored by Chief Judge Gregory

Opinions

Majority
by Motz
November 13, 2020
Read opinion ↗
Dissent
by Richardson
November 13, 2020
Read opinion ↗

Disposition

Court: Reversed, vacated, and remanded
Normalized: Reversed & Remanded

November 13, 2020