18-1534·CONTRACT
Diana Mey v. DIRECTV, LLC
Vacated & Remanded
Status
- Scheduled
- Argued
- Opinion Issued (current)
Question Presented
Propriety of district court's order determining that class action claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act did not fall within the scope of arbitration provision.
Argument Date
January 28, 2020
Argument Time
9:30 a.m.
Panel
V
Courtroom
Tweed Courtroom (Room 414-D)
Lower Court Judge
Bailey
Panel
Judge Floyd
Judge Harris
Judge Rushing
Citation
CaseDiana Mey v. DIRECTV, LLC, No. 18-1534 (4th Cir. Aug. 7, 2020)
PanelFloyd, Harris & Rushing, JJ.
Arguing Counsel
Panel That Day
4 of 4 cases argued January 28, 2020 before this panel have been decided.
Decided
18-1534· This case
Diana Mey v. DIRECTV, LLC
Authored by Judge Rushing
18-2245
ALPS Prop. & Cas. v. Ivan Higgerson, Sr.
Authored by Per Curiam
18-4099
United States v. Charles Spivey, Jr.
Authored by Judge Floyd
19-7104
United States v. Brooks Chambers
Authored by Judge Floyd
Opinions
- Read opinion ↗August 7, 2020Majorityby Rushing
- Read opinion ↗August 7, 2020Dissentby Pamela Harris
Disposition
- Court
- Vacated and remanded
- Normalized
- Vacated & Remanded
August 7, 2020