of for the

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for employer on Title VII hostile work environment claim based on race-based harassment.

Whether substantial evidence supports the denial of asylum and withholding of removal based on agency's unable or unwilling finding.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for employer on breach of fiduciary duty claims related to denial of pension benefits under ERISA; related issues.

Whether district court erred in confirming arbitration award where arbitrator disregarded choice-of-law provision on state public policy grounds.

Whether the district court erred in finding that W. Va. Code § 11A-3-65 applied to foreclosure auction and provided "just compensation"; other issues.

Whether Energy Policy and Conservation Act preempts County's ban on the installation of gas appliances and their associated infrastructure in certain new buildings.

Whether Energy Policy and Conservation Act preempts Maryland Building Energy Performance Standards, which impose declining emissions caps on certain buildings.

Whether district court erred in abstaining from litigation related to Baltimore's Consumer Protection Ordinance, remanding to state court pursuant to Burford.

Whether district court erred in reversing jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in breach of contract action.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants employer and union on claims including sexual harassment, hostile work environment, violation of collective bargaining agreement.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant school district on race-and sex-based hostile work environment, constructive discharge and other claims.

Whether Maryland law prohibiting out-of-state beer manufacturers from transporting beer directly to consumers in Maryland violates dormant Commerce Clause.

Whether South Carolina v. Moore, 447 F.2d 1067 (4th Cir. 1971), applies to petitioners circumstances and warrants mandamus relief.

Challenge to NCDEQ's issuance of Clean Water Act § 401 certification.

Challenge to Virginia DEQ's issuance of Clean Water Act § 401 certification.

In prosecution for healthcare benefit fraud, whether people whose identities were used by defendant were properly considered vulnerable victims for purpose of sentencing enhancement.

Whether district court erred in dismissing as time-barred complaint alleging race-based interference with agency agreements.

Whether district court may rely on judge-found drug quantities when recalculating benchmark Guidelines range for First Step Act movant who was sentenced pre-Apprendi; other issues.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant employer on claims alleging race discrimination, retaliation, related claims.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant on claims alleging race discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, constructive discharge, intentional and/or negligent infliction of emotional distress.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant on disparate treatment, disparate impact claims under Fair Housing Act; related issues.

Whether defendant transmits a threat in interstate commerce, 18 U.S.C. § 875(c), when he transmits it within state, and it subsequently crosses state lines.

Whether agency abused its discretion by finding noncitizen failed to demonstrate government authorities were unwilling or unable to protect her from private actors.

Whether district court erred in preliminarily enjoining defendant from removing certain materials from school library, requiring certain removed materials to be restored; related issues.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims alleging violations of the Medicaid Act for failure to state a claim, lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims for breach of fiduciary duty and duty to monitor under ERISA.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims including violation of Plan documents, breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA.

Propriety of district court's ruling that habeas petitioner was unlikely to succeed on either regulatory or due process challenge to intended third-country removal.

Whether search conducted by accessing cell-site location information was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

Whether denial of motion to discharge local counsel violated Sixth Amendment; whether court erred in declining to strike potential jurors for cause; other issues.

Whether indictment for religious obstruction, 18 U.S.C. § 247(a)(2), was duplicitous; whether religious obstruction involving intent to kill is crime of violence; other issues.

Whether district court erred in declining to enjoin enforcement of the source-of-funds provision of the Virginia Fair Housing Law.

Whether district court erred in dismissing for failure to state a claim constitutional challenge to ex parte reexamination of patents.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of employer on retaliation claims.

Whether district court erred in finding defendants protected by quasi-judicial and qualified immunity in suit challenging post-release supervision requirements.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment on claims alleging breach of fiduciary duties.

Whether appeal is permitted under § 16(a)(1)(B) of Federal Arbitration Act; propriety of court's refusal to compel arbitration under 2023 amendment to 2017 contract.

Whether district court erred in denying appellant's motion for leave to late-file and answer and claim regarding petition for exoneration from or limitation of liability.

Whether Tax Court erred in valuing property for purposes of charitable deduction donation to land conservation group.

Whether tax court erred in valuing conservation easement donation.

Whether district court erred in affirming bankruptcy court's finding that appellant owed a nondischargeable debt to appellees.

Whether Government forfeited right to invoke appeal's untimeliness by seeking dismissal only after this Court's Anders review; whether risk-notification condition violates Article III.

Whether Peters's 18 U.S.C. § 2, 1028A(a)(1) conviction remains sound following Dubin v.United States, 599 U.S. 110 (2023).

Whether district court erred finding claimant in civil forfeiture action lacked ownership interest in defendant currency. 2A Auto Trade, Inc.

Whether district court erred in dismissing as moot constitutional challenge to enactment and enforcement of amendment to county zoning ordinance.

Whether the district court erroneously dismissed claims premised on Defendant's denial of Plaintiffs' requests for religious exemption from COVID-19 vaccination policy; other issues.

Whether district court erred in dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, complaint related to plaintiffs' loss of access to account funds during banking outage.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant in qui tam action alleging violations of False Claims Act, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims for monopolization in U.S. sales of refrigerant R-454B, related claims.

Whether district court erred in finding Virginia Code § 37.2-416.1 unconstitutional as applied to appellant.

Whether court abused its discretion in finding that Defendant did not show "extraordinary and compelling reasons" supporting compassionate release; other issues.

Propriety of BIA's summary dismissal of appeal; whether BIA should have permitted reopening of case based on email not submitted with original motion.

Whether district court erred in concluding statements lacked defamatory meaning, dismissing defamation claims.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant insurance company.

Whether failure to sever resulted in unfair prejudice to defendants that could not be cured by jury instruction; sufficiency of evidence; other issues.

Whether district court erred in granting qualified immunity to law enforcement officer for use of deadly force.

Whether Maryland common law offense of assault with intent to rob is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act.

Challenge to jury verdict in case alleging trade secrets violations.

Whether imposition of life term of supervised release violated Ex Post Facto Clause; whether district court erred in imposing location monitoring condition.

Whether petitioner demonstrated that he is entitled to proceed through the actual innocence gateway to excuse the procedural bars to his federal habeas petition.

Whether district court erred in dismissing ERISA claims alleging defendants failed to act as a "prudent fiduciary."

Whether district court erred in dismissing complaint alleging interference with rights under Family and Medical Leave Act and retaliation.

Whether district court erred in denying motion to compel arbitration.

Propriety of summary judgment grant on excessive force claims against dog handler and deputy who allegedly choked Plaintiff.

Whether district court erred in granting motion for judgment as a matter of law on asserted defamatory statement insinuating plaintiff hacked defendant; other issues.

Whether the Board erred in applying In re M-R-M-S-when it concluded Petitioners did not show persecution on account of family particular social group.

Whether adverse credibility determination was error; whether, even in absence of credible testimony, record established claim for protection under Convention Against Torture.

Whether district court erred in enjoining enforcement of certain Executive Order provisions directing agencies to avoid funding gender ideology or gender affirming care.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of appellees in breach of contract suit related to oil and gas lease.

Whether and to what extent immigration judges have a duty in counseled asylum cases to help articulate a cognizable particular social group.

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 3504(a) requirement applies to surveillance under Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801 to 1818; other issues.

Whether EPA's disqualification of grantmaking organizations that promote or take part in environmental justice initiatives exceeded Agency's authority or was arbitrary and capricious.

Whether district court erred in dismissing First and Fourteenth Amendment claims of religious discrimination.

Whether a driver's furtive movement coupled with close proximity justifies a constructive possession finding.

Whether law enforcement's use of pole cameras to surveil defendant for about five months constituted search under Fourth Amendment; other issues.

Whether district court erred in limiting cross-examination of detective; whether court abused its discretion in determinations regarding hearsay and present sense impression; other issues.

Whether district court erred in quashing subpoena of records related to transgender healthcare.

Whether district court erred in abstaining pursuant to Younger in suit challenging Maryland's Gun Industry Accountability Act; related issues.

Propriety of dismissal of claims brought following vehicle pursuit ending in death; propriety of failure to convert dismissal motions to summary judgment motions.

Whether district court erred in preliminarily enjoining West Virginia Statute regulating certain synthetic food additives.

Propriety of district court deferring to the West Virginia courts' state habeas rulings related to petitioner's claims under Brady and Napue.

Whether Environmental Appeals Board lacks jurisdiction to review permits issued by Maryland Dept. of the Environment.

Whether the district court abused its discretion by finding common issues predominated and certifying class.