Richmond, VA

Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is untimely and, if so, whether petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling.

Whether district court erred in dismissing Fair Credit Reporting Act claims related to FBI's assembly of consumer information into reports to be used for employment and licensing purposes.

Whether district court erred in preliminarily enjoining defendant county from denying plaintiff church's rezoning application.

Whether target of search has Fourth Amendment or common law right to view preindictment warrant; other issues.

Whether district court erred in preliminarily enjoining West Virginia S.B. 325.

Whether district court erred in declining to preliminarily enjoin Maryland H.B. 1056.

Whether FAA erred in finding the City remained bound by its Surplus Property Act obligations under the 1953 Deed Release.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims seeking declaratory relief related to defendant liability insurance company’s duty to defend plaintiff.

Whether district court erred in denying motion to dismiss superseding indictment for Speedy Trial Act violation; other issues.

Whether district court erred in declining to order return of minor children to Paraguay in proceedings under International Child Abduction Remedies Act.

Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining enforcement of Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-83.6:2, which prohibits law enforcement from wearing face-covering masks.

Whether district court erred in preliminarily enjoining Virginia statute requiring social media companies implement parental controls limiting minors' access to platforms.

Whether district court abused its discretion in denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion seeking to present new evidence regarding PLRA exhaustion; other issues.

Whether Defendant was prejudiced by trial counsel's erroneous advice that the Government could not advocate for sentence beyond drug quantity stipulated in factual basis.

Whether admission of Google Drive evidence identified by automated system, including matching hash values, violated the Confrontation Clause; other issues.

Whether district court erred in finding that the Trustee's claims under Bankruptcy Code § 544(b)(1) fail because there is no "triggering creditor" who could have avoided the dividend transfers under applicable law.

Multiple sentencing challenges, including whether district court failed to give adequate weight to defendant's atypical and severe childhood trauma; applicability of categorical approach.

Whether White's written criminal judgment contains discretionary conditions of supervised release that are materially different from those pronounced at sentencing.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for SBA related to agency's denial of PPP loan forgiveness.

Whether district court erred in granting defendant's motion for directed verdict on strict liability manufacturing defect, related issues.

Whether district court erred in dismissing Seventh Amendment, Article III, and Article II claims related to alleged violations of Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for agency on Title VII race discrimination claims.

Whether possession of a controlled substance, in violation of Va. Code § 18.2-250, is necessarily a Grade B violation.

Whether district court erred in dismissing employee's claims for wrongful discharge under Maryland common law.

Whether district court erred in dismissing qui tam complaint alleging false claims related to government procurement facilitated by Defense Logistics Agency.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims for retaliation under Title VII and 42 USC 1981.

Whether excess-earnings offset in 30 U.S.C. § 932(g) applies to miners diagnosed with complicated pneumoconiosis.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for employer on claims of deprivation of benefits and wrongful termination under USERRA.

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) is unconstitutional, both facially and as applied to defendant.

WhetherFood, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act preempts North Carolina abortion regulations; other issues.

Whether district court erred in dismissing breach of contract and declaratory judgment counts for failure to state a claim.

Whether search warrant affidavit lacked probable cause and whether good faith exception applies; whether district court erred in denying Defendant’s request for Franks hearing.

Whether, in Hobbs Act robbery prosecution, the Government adduced sufficient evidence that the robberies affected interstate commerce; other issues.

Whether district court erred in dismissing Title VII retaliation claims.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for employer on Title VII retaliation and sex discrimination claims.

Whether district court erred in confirming arbitration award in favor of employer related to USERRA discrimination and retaliation claims.

Whether district court erred in dismissing Fair Credit Reporting Act claims related to credit reporting agency’s duty to investigate disputed information.

Whether district court erred in denying motion to suppress when K-9 repeatedly touched car during sniff; other issues.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment related to appellee's duty to defend insureds in suit arising from injury at short-term rental property.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment to City on procedural and substantive due process claims related to denial of building permit; related issues.

Whether the official victim enhancement under USSG section3A1.2(c)(1) applies; and whether the district court adequately explained its rationale.

Whether sufficient evidence supported continuing criminal enterprise conviction; whether district court abused its discretion by admitting certain video evidence at trial; other issues.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants on claims of race and ethnicity discrimination under 42 USC § 1981.

Propriety of the Board's denial of petitioner's motion to remand based on former counsel's alleged ineffective representation; standard of review; other issues.

Whether three consecutive sentences for three false statements in a single interview created multiplicity issue; whether Apprendi error was harmless.

Propriety of agency holding that petitioner's misdemeanor conviction under Va. Code Ann. 18.2-258.1 rendered petitioner removable and ineligible for cancellation of removal.

Whether Maryland program for awarding cannabis sales licenses violates Dormant Commerce Clause.

Whether district court erred in granting habeas relief, vacating death sentence.

Whether district court erred in denying motion for judgment as a matter of law, motion for new trial related to Title VII retaliation and state wrongful discharge claims.

Whether the Board impermissibly substituted its judgment for that of the Immigration Judge in denying relief under the Convention Against Torture.

Whether 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1)(A)excludes all offenses assigned one point, including a status point assigned to the instant offense under USSG § 4A1.1(e).

Petition for review of EPA's approval of West Virginia's regional haze implementation plan.

Petition for review of EPA's approval of West Virginia's application for primacy of enforcement authority over Class VI carbon sequestration wells.

Whether plaintiffs have standing to challenge approval of mitigation bank when developer may use mitigation credits to satisfy environmental regulatory requirements for land development.

Whether West Virginia statute of limitations commenced running on date of loss or date insurer indicated, in writing, that it declined to cover loss.

In prosecution under 18 U.S.C. section922(g)(1), was evidence insufficient for jury to conclude that appellant knew his decade-old convictions amounted to disqualifying felonies?

Whether order reducing sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) or § 3582 (c)(1)(A)constitutes new judgment that resets 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion counter.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act as barred by the discretionary-function exception.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims, granting summary judgment for defendants on claims related to plaintiff's wrongful placement on sex offender registry.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for USCIS in dispute related to denial of application to replace Green Card.

Whether felony violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 111(a)(1) requires proof that defendant forcibly and intentionally caused physical contact with assault victim; other issues.

Whether district court erred in certifying class in case alleging breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA.

Whether district court erred in granting qualified immunity to defendant Brig officials on RFRA And RLUIPA claims related to mandatory grooming policy.

Whether trial and appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to challenge defendant's career offender enhancement.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant insurance company in declaratory judgment action related to underinsured motorist coverage.

Whether unaccompanied 13-year-oldadmitted pursuant to Visa Waiver Program had capacity to waive right to contest removal in future proceedings; other issues.

Whether district court erred in prohibiting HHS to make certain modifications to existing policies related to health insurance exchanges under Affordable Care Act.

Whether government lacked authority to bring challenge to district court's standing order related to automatic temporary stays of removal in habeas cases brought by alien detainees; related issues.