Richmond, VA

Whether the Government submitted a warrant application that recklessly omitted material information in violation of the Fourth Amendment; other issues.

Whether district court erred granting summary judgment in favor of officer in case alleging excessive force, unlawful search and seizure gross negligence.

Whether district court properly granted class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(1) on ERISA claims related to defined-contribution retirement plan.

Whether district court erred granting summary judgment for defendant on claims alleging race and gender discrimination.

Whether district court erred in denying correctional officers' qualified immunity in case involving death of individual while in custody.

Whether district court erred in denying qualified immunity for sheriff's deputy who shot an individual on whom he was attempting to serve an involuntary commitment order.

Whether district court erred in denying defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law in case alleging WARN Act violations.

Whether district court erred in granting in part petition for habeas corpus on the basis of speedy trial violations and ineffective assistance.

Whether district court erred interpreting distribution agreement, awarding judgment to plaintiff in breach of contract case.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims for constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1985 and state law tort claims.

Whether district court erred finding victims of mass shooting lacked article III standing to sue gun manufacturers for allegedly dangerous and deceptive marketing practices; other issues.

Whether agreement to shorten limitations period for claims related to employment is enforceable; related issues.

Appeal from grant of summary judgment in contract dispute related to nonconforming motorcycle parts supplied by manufacturer, resulting in safety recall.

Whether district court erred in dismissing third-party claims for lack of personal jurisdiction; other issues.

Whether NC Department of Adult Corrections prohibition against incarcerated individuals assisting another person with litigation or legal matters violates the First Amendment; other issues.

Whether this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal; other issues.

Whether district court erred in dismissing plaintiff's claims related to her involuntary commitment.

Whether district court erred in dismissing claims alleging mistreatment of children in custody of S.C. Department South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP of Juvenile Justice.

Whether Board erred in denying motion to terminate based on Petitioner's claim he derived U.S. citizenship from mother.

Whether district court erred dismissing claims arising from insurance coverage dispute.

Whether district court erred in concluding certain claims raised in third amended complaint were first made during policy coverage period; related issues.

Whether district court erred in granting summary judgment for corrections officers in case alleging deliberate indifference and failure to protect.

Whether district court erred in reopening case, alleged copyright violation abrogates state sovereign immunity.

Whether district court erred in concluding plaintiff was not entitled to indemnification from defendant insurance company.

Whether "Texas Two-Step" restructuring, dividing business to protect the larger entity from creditors, is indicia of bad faith for purposes of bankruptcy stay.

Whether district court erred in granting judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants on trade secrets claims.

Propriety of agency's determination that petitioner was not admitted into this country in any valid status upon returning on a grant of advance parole.

Whether district court erred in concluding defendant lender aided and abetted fraud committed by borrower against plaintiff.

Multi-issue appeal related to prison's discontinuance of appellant's Medication for Opioid Use Disorder and shackling of appellant late in pregnancy, during labor, and immediately postpartum.

Whether district court erred granting summary judgment for defendant retirement community on claims arising from failure to provide gluten free meals for resident with celiac disease.

Whether district court erred granting summary judgment in favor of city on antitrust, regulatory taking, and other claims.

Challenge to grant of summary judgment in favor of officer defendants in case alleging fabrication of evidence, withholding of exculpatory evidence, other violations.

Whether district court erred in concluding plaintiff is entitled to receive a list of registered South Carolina voters under 52 U.S.C. § 20507(i)(1); related issues.

Whether Maryland's Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act conflicts with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act or violates due process; related issues.

Whether district court erred granting summary judgment for city on claims for violations of FMLA, West Virginia public policy.

Whether district court erred in dismissing plaintiff's claims for race discrimination, retaliation, and condonation.

Whether district court erred in dismissing with prejudice plaintiff's negligence and strict liability claims arising from workplace injury.

Whether district court erred in declining to grant a preliminary injunction for plaintiff requesting religious accommodations related to school board's policy on transgender students.

Whether sheriff's department violated due process in failing to provide notice and opportunity to be heard after seizing property in which plaintiff had an ownership interest.

Whether the totality of the circumstances supported officer's reasonable suspicion of criminal activity sufficient to justify prolongment of a traffic stop.

Whether defendant with suspended license had standing to challenge search of rental car; evidentiary sufficiency for CCE, drug, and murder-for-hire conspiracy charges; other issues.

Whether the Tucker Act strips jurisdiction from the district court over plaintiff's APA, separation-of-powers, and ultra vires claims; related issues.

Jurisdictional challenge to district court's grant of injunctive relief in favor of plaintiffs related to suspension and cancellation of grant funding; related issues.

Multi-issue appeal of convictions arising from defendants post-September 11 comments alleged to have inspired individuals to obtain weapons training from a terrorist organization.

Whether district court erred in declining to preliminarily enjoin Maryland statute restricting energy suppliers' speech related to green energy.

Whether district court erred in declining to allow termination or reformation of lease.

Multi-issue cross-appeal including issues related to admissibility of evidence and whether district court erred in declining to enter a forfeiture judgment.

Whether district court erred in denying qualified immunity to officer related to use of deadly force.

Whether court abused its discretion under United States v. Rybicki, 96 F.3d 754 (4th Cir. 1996) in departing upward; whether sentence is substantively reasonable.

Whether the court abused its discretion by rejecting, without evidentiary hearing, claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to pursue a plea agreement.

Whether district court erred in dismissing plaintiff's claims for race and sex discrimination and retaliation.

Whether plaintiffs preserved argument that their complaint should not have been dismissed solely because they failed to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss.

Whether this Court has jurisdiction when the parties manufactured final decision jurisdiction through the stipulated dismissal of the plaintiff's remaining claim; other issues.

Whether plaintiffs sufficiently stated claims of discrimination and retaliation related to Board's reduction in force process and subsequent actions.

Whether district court erred in revoking supervised release for violating conditions that were not imposed in compliance with Rogers; whether claim is barred.